The vibrant fabric of Indian democracy, representing over 1.4 billion people, is currently facing a significant strain. A growing trend of political intolerance is reshaping the landscape, transforming traditional ideological debates into what appears to be a bitter rivalry between factional leaders rather than a constructive dialogue between democratic entities.
From Opposition to Enmity
In recent years, the relationship between the BJP-led NDA and the Congress-led UPA (and its successors) has undergone a fundamental shift. Members of Parliament, once viewed as colleagues with differing perspectives, are increasingly treated as “rival enemies.” This shift undermines the core principle that the opposition is just as vital to safeguarding democracy as the ruling party.
Historically, political friction was largely confined to election campaigns and the floor of the House. Even during intense legislative battles, a degree of cordiality often existed in the lobbies. Today, that middle ground is vanishing. The spirit of governance is frequently overshadowed by personal animosity, a characteristic more commonly associated with autocratic regimes than healthy democracies.
The Spread of Confrontational Politics
This “Delhi-style” polarization is no longer restricted to the capital; it has metastasized into various states. In West Bengal, the rivalry between the Trinamool Congress and the BJP has reached unprecedented heights, often resulting in systemic friction that transcends policy.
The Silenced Assembly in AP
Allegations of Suppressed Voices and Disrespect for Democracy in AP
In Andhra Pradesh, the tension between the ruling alliance and the YSR Congress has led to accusations of democratic suppression. In these regions, the legal system is increasingly weaponized. Cases are frequently filed against political rivals not necessarily on solid legal grounds, but to settle personal and political scores. When the ruling party refuses to tolerate the presence of an opposition at any level, the democratic spirit is the first casualty. In Andhra Pradesh, a significant legislative deadlock has emerged as MLAs from the opposition YSR Congress have opted to boycott Assembly sessions. The party alleges that they are being denied adequate time to voice the grievances and plight of the public, claiming their role as an opposition is being systematically stifled.
In response, leaders from the ruling Telugu Desam Party (TDP) have refuted these claims, dismissing the boycott as a lack of respect for democratic institutions. They argue that by staying away from the House, the opposition is abandoning its constitutional duty to engage in debate and represent its constituents. This standoff highlights a deepening rift in the state’s political fabric, where the floor of the Assembly—intended for deliberation—has instead become a symbol of partisan division.
A New Definition of Democracy?
If this trajectory continues, the traditional understanding of Indian democracy may require a somber redefinition. Democracy thrives on the “middle path“—the ability to disagree without dehumanizing the opponent. If political leaders continue to prioritize personal rivalry over the mandate to govern, the institutional foundations of the nation risk long-term erosion. For the health of the Republic, a return to parliamentary civility and a focus on the electorate’s welfare is not just preferred; it is essential.
Editor, Prime Post
Ravindra Seshu Amaravadi, is a senior journalist with 38 years of experience in Telugu, English news papers and electronic media. He worked in Udayam as a sub-editor and reporter. Later, he was associated with Andhra Pradesh Times, Gemini news, Deccan Chronicle, HMTV and The Hans India. Earlier, he was involved in the research work of All India Kisan Sabha on suicides of cotton farmers. In Deccan Chronicle, he exposed the problems of subabul and chilli farmers and malpractices that took place in various government departments.
